Int. Med
J Vol
4 No 2 December 2005
Sideroblastic Anaemia In A Malay Family
Marini R, W.
Zaidah W.A, Suhair A., Rosline H
Department Of Hematology,
School Of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian,
Kelantan;
ABSTRACT
Three cases
of sideroblastic anaemia diagnosed from one family were described. A 41-year old
Malay mother had been reported as having primary acquired sideroblastic anaemia
: Refractory anaemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) from bone marrow aspirate
during her first pregnancy. The diagnosis was made because there was no history
of anaemia at younger age, no family history of anaemia and no identifiable
secondary causes were recognised. Ten years later it was discovered that two of
her children, also developed refractory anaemia and were diagnosed as
sideroblastic anaemia. Hence, the initial diagnosis of the acquired
sideroblastic anaemia had been reviewed because there were more than one person
in the family who were affected. The diagnosis of hereditary sideroblastic
anaemia was the most probable. Investigations such as enzyme assay and DNA
analysis are required to further sub-classifiey this disorder. These cases
emphasize the importance of evaluating all cases suspected of acquired disorder
RARS for pyridoxine responsiveness to exclude hereditary form.
Keyword : Hereditary sideroblastic anaemia,
Pyridoxine-responsive sideroblastic anaemia
INTRODUCTION
Sideroblastic anaemias
comprise of a heterogenous group of refractory anaemias characterized by the
presence of anaemia, low reticulocyte count and ineffective erythropoiesis1.
The key for diagnosis is the presence of 15% ring sideroblast in erythroid
precursors of bone marrow aspirate. It can be classified as acquired or
hereditary type. The acquired form is more common2. It can be
idiopathic or caused by drugs, toxins and certain diseases such as
myelodysplastic syndrome. The anaemia normally manifests later in life2.
The hereditary form could be either X-linked or autosomal inheritance. The
commonest form is X-linked. Here, we report a case of a mother who was earlier
diagnosed as primary acquired disorder RARS. This previous diagnosis in the
mother had been reviewed in this report, becauset two of her children were also
diagnosed as sideroblastic anaemia later. Though primary acquired RARS is more
common, the diagnosis of hereditary type needs to be excluded by doing anaemia
work-up and follow-ups for the whole family.
CASE REPORT
A 41-year-old mother was
diagnosed as primary acquired sideroblastic anaemia in 1988 during her first
pregnancy. At that time she presented with severe anaemia (Hb 4.3g/dl, MCV 95.8
fl) for which she received red cells transfusion and haematinics. There was no
significant past medical and drug history. There was also no family history of
anaemia. On examination, there was no hepatosplenomegaly. Her peripheral blood
film showed normochromic normocytic anaemia with anisocytosis and bone marrow
revealed marked erythroid hyperplasia showing dyserythropoeitic features and 17%
ring sideroblasts. Reticulocytes count was 0.2%. White blood cells and platelet
counts were within normal ranges. Serum ferritin was raised (510mg/l)
with normal levels of serum folate and vitamin B12. Other investigations such as
renal and liver function tests, haemoglobin (Hb) electrophoresis and
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase screening were normal. Postnatally she had
another episode of severe anaemia (Hb 4.5g/dl, MCV 113fl) requiring red cells
transfusion. Following that, there was spontaneous improvement in her
haemoglobin level and then she was lost to follow-up. Five years later she
presented again during her third pregnancy with a similar complaint.
Her first son presented with
recurrent anaemia since he was three years of age and was admitted several times
to hospital for red cells transfusion. No history of jaundice, passing tea
colored urine or taking any drugs. At that time his baseline haemoglobin was
7g/dl. Reticulocytes count was 0.2%. Peripheral blood film revealed a dimorphic
blood picture showing hypochromic microcytic cells and macrocytes with
occasional basophilic stippling. Hb eletrophoresis was normal. Serum ferritin
was 367mg/L.
Patient was known to be G6PD deficient. Viral study was negative. His parents
refused further investigations until the year 2003 when he was 15 years of age;
bone marrow aspirate was performed and revealed sideroblastic anaemia with
presence of 15% ring sideroblasts (Fig:1) and erythroid hyperplasia with
underlying dyserythropoeisis with the presence of binucleated normoblast,
intercytoplasmic bridging and basophilic stippling.
|
 |
|
Figure
1: A photomicrograph of a bone marrow aspirate stained with Perl
staining
showing ring sideroblast (100x10) |
The second daughter presented
with recurrent anaemia requiring regular red cells transfusion since she was
three years of age. At that time her baseline haemoglobin level was 6.1g/dl.
Peripheral blood film showed normocytic normochromic anaemia. Reticulocytes
count was 1.0%. Bone marrow aspirate revealed erythroid hyperplasia with
dyserythropoeisis and presence of ring sideroblasts. She was diagnosed as having
HbE trait (most likely inherited from her father) and her serum ferritin was
87.8µg/L.
Both siblings were under
regular hospital follow-up since 2000 and were taking folic acid (5mg/daily) and
pyridoxine tablet (40mg/daily). Their haemoglobin levels significantly improved
between 10-11 g/dl with continuous oral pyridoxine intake.
DISCUSSION
In this case, the mother was
initially diagnosed as having primary acquired sideroblastic anaemia because of
several reasons; the patient is a female, with no history of anaemia at
childhood and her peripheral blood film showed a macrocytic anaemia and
returning to normal when she was not pregnant. There were no identifiable
secondary causes. Hence, she was diagnosed as primary acquired sideroblastic
anaemia.
Relapse during pregnancy may
have been due to increased demand for red cell production3.
The requirement for pyridoxine is markedly increased during pregnancy. The
pyridoxine responsiveness could not be assessed in this patient, as pyridoxine
therapy was not given. The diagnosis of primary acquired sideroblastic anaemia
made previously need to be reviewed now because two other family members are
affected by the same condition. It is most likely that the sideroblastic anaemia
in this family was an inherited disorder. In addition both of the children had
hypochromic microcytic anaemia and responding well to pyridoxine treatment. In
some patients, particularly with the hereditary type, there is a response to
pyridoxine therapy.
Hereditary sideroblastic
anaemia is a disease with hypochromic and microcytic anaemia, except in a very
rare syndrome such as Pearson’s syndrome where the presentation is macrocytic
anaemia, which usually presents in infancy and it is rapidly fatal4.
The commonest type of inherited disorder is X-linked sideroblastic anaemia (XLSA)
however it is unlikely for this family because both genders were equally
affected. Rarely, some women can be affected by XLSA however they normally
present later in life due to loss of clones expressing the normal alleles on the
X-chromosome4.
However, this needs to be confirmed by proper family studies and DNA analysis.
DNA sequencing will confirm delta-amino levulinic acid synthase-2 (ALAS-2) gene
mutation on the X chromosome in diagnosing XLSA2.
The identification of ALAS-2 gene mutation has an important role in patients’
management because XLSA does not progress to leukaemia4.
The other rare type of hereditary sideroblastic anaemia is an autosomal
inheritance which was the most likely diagnosis for this family
In conclusion, although
hereditary sideroblastic anaemia is a rare condition, the diagnosis should be
considered when more than one member of the family is affected. Trial of
pyridoxine treatment to assess responsiveness is important to be evaluated in
all cases of sideroblastic anaemia.
REFERENCES
1. Bottomley SS. Sideroblastic anaemia.
Clin Haematol. 1982 Jun;11(2):389-409. Review
2. Alcindor Thierry, Bridges, Kenneth R. Sideroblastic anemia (review).
Br J Haematol 2002; 116:733-743
3. Cazzola M, May A, Bergamaschi G, Cerani P, Rosti V, Bishop DF.
Familial-skewed X-chromosome inactivation as a predisposing factor for
late-onset X-linked sideroblastic anaemia in carrier females. Blood 2000; 96,
4363-4365.
4. Cotter PD, May A, Fitzsimons EJ, Houstan T, Woodcock BE, al-Sabah AI,
Wong L, Bishop DF. Late-onset X-linked sideroblastic anemia. Missense mutations
in the erythroid delta-aminolevulinate synthase (ALAS2) gene in two
pyridoxine-responsive patients initially diagnosed with acquired refractory
anemia and ringed sideroblasts. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96(4), 2090-2096.
Correspondence:
Dr Rosline Hassan,
Department of
Haematology,
School of Medical
Sciences,
University Sains
Malaysia,
16150 Kubang Kerian,
Kelantan, Malaysia.
e.mail :
roslin@kb.usm.my
tel. no : +609-7664139
Fax
no : +609-7653370